刑法形式解释与实质解释的本质把握——兼评实质解释论与形式解释论之争  

The Essential Grasp of Formal and Substantive Interpretation of Criminal Law——Comment on the Dispute Between Substantive and Formal Hermeneutics

作　　者：曲新久[1] Qu Xinjiu(School of Criminal Justice of China University of Political Science and Law)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2023年第4期99-110,共12页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：形式与本质之间的矛盾对立关系是刑法解释方法论上的基本问题,形式解释与实质解释的区分与对立,从不同的方面展现了这种矛盾对立关系。形式解释论的优点主要不在于形式先于并优于实质,而是原则优于目的的相对保守性;而实质解释论则是目的优先的能动的解释论。刑法解释需要面向本质问题,选择适当的解释方法,该作形式解释的作形式解释,该作实质解释的作实质解释,该作折中处理的作折衷解释。The contradictory relationship between the form and the substance is a basic issue in the methodology of criminal law interpretation.The distinction and opposition between formal interpretation and substantive interpretation show this contradictory relationship from different aspects.The advantage of formal interpretation is not that the form is prior to and superior to the substance,but the relatively conservative nature of principle over purpose;substantive interpretive theory is a dynamic interpretive theory that prioritizes purpose.The interpretation of criminal law needs to face the essential problems and choose the appropriate interpretation methods,which should be formal interpretation,substantive interpretation,and compromise interpretation.

关 键 词：刑法解释 形式解释 实质解释 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]