检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘毅[1] Liu Yi(Law School of Beijing Institute of Technology)
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学法学院
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2022年第4期100-114,共15页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:传统的比较法学研究局限于法学的知识体系内部,因而很难有新的突破。透过现代性社会理论的视角,我们会发现比较法学尤其是宏观比较法学与现代性有着密切的关联,具体来说,比较法学的兴起、比较法学的困境以及比较法学的重要问题,都可以在现代性社会理论的背景下予以深度反思。在当前去西方中心主义的全球化时代,新兴的多元现代性理论有助于在文明转型和全球化的背景下重构宏观比较法学的研究方法与范式。The research of traditional comparative law is limited to the knowledge system of law,so it is difficult to make new breakthroughs.From the perspective of modern social theory,we will find that comparative law,especially macro comparative law,is closely related to modernity.Specifically,the rise of comparative law,the plight of comparative law,and important issues of comparative law can all be addressed deeply reflecting on the background of modern social theory.In the current era of globalization with decentralization of the west,the emerging theory of plural modernity helps to comprehensively update and reconstruct the research methods and paradigms of macro comparative jurisprudence in the context of civilized transformation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63