检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗爽[1] 卿伟[1] 徐兴英 文小燕 LUO Shuang;QING Wei;XU Xingying;WEN Xiaoyan(Deyang People’s Hospital,Deyang,Sichuan,618000)
出 处:《智慧健康》2022年第23期177-180,184,共5页Smart Healthcare
摘 要:目的探讨奥马哈系统模式对居家腹膜透析患者腹膜炎发生率的循证分析。方法选取2016年5月-2017年5月德阳市人民医院出院的腹膜透析患者96例,按照数字表法将患者随机分为两组,对照组应用常规护理干预,研究组应用奥马哈系统模式进行护理干预。结果干预后研究组居家透析质量核查优于对照组(P<0.05);研究组ESCA评分高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组腹膜炎发生原因控制情况明显优于对照组(P<0.05);研究组腹膜炎发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在针对居家腹膜透析患者的护理过程当中,应用奥马哈系统模式进行护理干预效果理想,临床上应当进一步推广应用。Objective To explore the evidence-based analysis of the incidence rate of peritonitis in patients with home peritoneal dialysis by the system mode of Omaha.Methods A total of 96 cases of peritoneal dialysis patients discharged from our hospital from May 2016 to May 2017 were selected.The patients were randomLy divided into two groups according to the number table method.Routine nursing intervention was applied in the control group,and nursing intervention was conducted in the study group using the Omaha system model.Results Home dialysis quality verification in the study group was better than that in the control group(P<0.05).ESCA score of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The causes of peritonitis in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of peritonitis in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion In the nursing process of home patients with peritoneal dialysis,the application of the Omaha system model for nursing intervention effect is ideal,and should be further popularized in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.244.172