检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁朋超 Ding Pengchao
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学法治与经济发展研究所
出 处:《中德法学论坛》2020年第2期64-95,共32页
基 金:广东高校科研青年创新人才类项目“高素质法律职业共同体养成路径研究”(2018WQNCX045)的阶段性成果
摘 要:德国在吸收Stuttgart模式的基础上于1977年颁布《简化促进法》,该法通过确立主要期日及强化当事人诉讼促进义务实现了德国民事案件的集中审理并且成效显著。为解决诉讼迟延化及言词辩论虚置化等问题,我国新民诉法及新司法解释开始转向新的且是现代化的集中审理方式,然而由于制度理念的限制及立法的粗陋,集中审理效果并不理想。我国应当借鉴以德国为代表的大陆法系国家集中审理的先进经验,从增设程序保障之宪法权利、完善争点整理程序方法及庭前准备制度、明确并强化法官的释明义务等层面入手重塑我国的集中审理制度。Germany adopted the Simplified Promotion Act in 1977,which basis of absorbing the Stuttgart model.This law achieved a centralized trial of German civil cases by establishing the main date and strengthening the parties'litigation promotion obligations.China's new civil law and new judicial interpretation began to shift to a new and modern centralized trial system,which In order to solve the prob-lems of delaying litigation and falsification of speech debates.However,due to the limitation of the system concept and the rudeness of the legislation,the effect of centralized trial not ideal.China should learn from the advanced experience of cen-tralized trial in the civil law countries represented by Germany,and start to reshape our centralized trial from the perspectives of adding procedural guarantees for con-stitutional rights,perfecting dispute issues procedures and methods,and clarifying and strengthening judges'obligation to clarify.
关 键 词:德国集中审理 争点整理程序 书状先行 Stuttgart模式
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3