次国家政府如何制定和实施独特的政策议程?  

How can subnational governments develop and deliver distinctive policy agendas?

作　　者：安德鲁·康奈尔 艾米丽·圣丹尼 史蒂夫·马丁 王进旭(译) 熊缨(审校) Andrew Connell;Emily St Denny;Steve Martin;Wang Jinxu(Cardiff University,UK;University of Copenhagen,Denmark;不详)

机构地区：[1]英国卡迪夫大学威尔士公共政策中心 [2]丹麦哥本哈根大学政治学系 [3]威尔士公共政策中心 [4]英国卡迪夫大学 [5]北京石墨烯研究院 [6]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论（中文版）》2022年第4期265-283,共19页International Review of Administrative Sciences

基　　金：经济与社会研究理事会的支持(紧急拨款号ES/N00745X/1)

摘　　要：次国家政府制定和实施独特政策的方式对我们理解有效的多层次治理体系至关重要。现有著述侧重于机构自治和赋予次国家政府的正式权力,但这都只是一个侧面而已。成功还取决于政策参与者如何部署其权力、资源和合法性。本文对两种不同的尝试进行了实证分析,这些尝试在次国家层面上制定了不同的政策框架。它表明,必须超越正式的机构权力,关注决策者的政治技能和知名度,以及他们在部署正式权力时采用的战略和战术。报告特别强调,次国家政府有必要把重点放在它们能够发挥作用的问题上,并利用它们在政策网络中的节点性,促进与能够带来互补资源的国家和非国家组织的合作。The ways in which subnational governments develop and deliver distinctive policies is central to our understanding of effective multi-level governance systems.The existing literature focuses on institutional autonomy and the formal powers given to subnational governments but this is only one side of the story.Success also depends on the way in which policy actors deploy their powers,resources and legitimacy.This article presents an empirical analysis of two contrasting attempts to develop distinctive policy frame¬works at the subnational level.It demonstrates the importance of looking beyond formal institutional powers and paying attention to policymakers'political skills and visibility,as well as the strategies and tactics that they employ in deploying formal powers.It highlights,in particular,the need for subnational governments to focus on those issues where they can make a difference and to exploit their nodality within policy networks to foster collaboration with state and non-state actors who bring complementary resources.

关 键 词：议程设置 酒精政策 治理 无家可归 次国家政府 政策工具 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学] D034