利益相关者的参与和爱尔兰公私合作制的未来  

Stakeholder engagement and the future of Irish public-private partnerships

作　　者：盖尔·谢帕德 马蒂亚斯·贝克 刘晓宇(译) 王秋蕾(审校) Gail Sheppard;Matthias Beck;Liu Xiaoyu(Technological University Dublin,Ireland;University College Cork,Ireland;不详)

机构地区：[1]都柏林科技大学 [2]爱尔兰科克大学商学院 [3]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论（中文版）》2022年第3期246-267,共22页International Review of Administrative Sciences

摘　　要：基于最近强调利益相关者的参与对于公私合作制重要性的研究,我们提出了一个新的用于评估公私合作制的基准框架。该框架将相互性和维持组织认同描述为伙伴关系的理想特征,因为其能够反过来激励利益相关者支持公私合作伙伴关系。当将此框架用于分析爱尔兰基础设施建设中的公私合作伙伴关系时,我们注意到其伙伴关系中的相互问责在金融危机发生后被削弱了。与此同时,在我们调查的教育、司法和卫生公私合作制中,与公私合作制中关键利益相关者等客户的协商(这将有助于明确组织身份)仍然不够完善。然而在这一点上,不同部门间也存在差异。在教育系统中,协商仍然以校长为主,而教职工与工会则被忽略。在司法领域,协商主要以法官为中心。同样,在医疗卫生领域,(协商)重点是临床医生。总而言之,私营部门推动的协商工作主要是务实的,其重点是防止延误和关键客户的不满——这些客户可能会阻止未来项目的实现。我们认为,这种精心安排的协商方式,加上将公私合作伙伴关系合同委托给一个保持距离型的政府机构,很可能促进爱尔兰公私合作关系的去政治化,就像在其他国家观察到的那样。同时,可以通过一套侧重于提高决策透明度的协调措施以及强制客户和公众协商的框架,来避免公私合作伙伴关系中出现利益相关者脱离的有害情况。Building on recent works that stress the importance of stakeholder engagement in partnerships,we propose a novel benchmarking framework for the evaluation of public-private partnerships.This framework describes mutuality and the preservation of organisational identity as the ideal characteristics of partnerships because they.In turn,encourage stakeholder support for public-private partnerships.Applying this framework to infrastructure public-private partnerships in Ireland,we note that mutual accountability has been weakened following the financial crisis.Meanwhile,consultation with clients such as key public-private partnership stakeholders,which would help articulate organisational identities,remains patchy across the education,justice and health public-private partnership that we investigate.Nonetheless,there are sectoral differences.In education,consultation centres on school prindpals while ignoring teaching staff and trade unions.In justice,attention is focused primarily on judges.Similarfy;in health sector public-private partnerships,there is a strong focus on clinicians.Overall,private sector-driven consultation efforts are primarily pragmatic,with afocus on preventing delays and the dissatisfaction of key clients who could prevent future projects from materialising.We suggest that the combination of this calculated approach to consultation,together with the delegation of public-private partnership contracting to an arm's-length government agency,is likely to promote a similar depo liticisation of Irish public private partnerships as has been observed in other countries.We argue that the potentialy harmful stakeholder disengagement that this might encourage can be addressed through a concerted set of measures focusing on improved transparency of decision-making,as well as frameworks that mandate client and public consultation.

关 键 词：问责制 相互性 公私合作制 利益相关者 可持续性 

分 类 号：D756.2[政治法律—政治学]