全程心理护理干预对心脏介入治疗患者的影响  

Effect of whole-course psychological nursing intervention on the therapeutic effect of patients with cardiac interventional therapy

作　　者：林霞[1] 杨雨兰 钱秋月[1] 王小兰[1] LIN Xia;YANG Yulan;QIAN Qiuyue;WANG Xiaolan(Dongtai People's Hospital,Dongtai 224299,China)

机构地区：[1]东台市人民医院,江苏东台224200

出　　处：《心理月刊》2022年第7期139-141,共3页

摘　　要：目的探究全程心理护理干预对心脏介入治疗患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、生活质量评分、护理满意度评分、住院时间、疼痛评分、并发症发生率的影响。方法从2021年1月~2021年12月本院收治的接受心脏介入治疗的患者中抽选100例作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为两组,实验组50例,接受全程心理护理干预,对照组50例,接受常规护理干预,对比两组SAS评分、SDS评分、生活质量评分、护理满意度评分、住院时间、疼痛评分,采用t检验;对比两组并发症发生率,采用x^(2)检验。结果护理前,两组患者SAS评分、SDS评分差异不显著(P>0.05);护理后,实验组患者SAS评分为39.58±5.14分,SDS评分为40.58±6.73分,对照组患者SAS评分为43.21±6.35分,SDS评分为44.58±6.97,实验组评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。护理前,两组患者精神健康、社会功能、情感职能、躯体疼痛、生理功能、总体健康、总分等生活质量评分差异不显著(P>0.05);护理后,实验组患者各项生活质量评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组患者护理满意度评分为95.34±4.11分,对照组患者护理满意度评分为90.52±6.73分,实验组评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组患者住院时间为7.25±1.58 d,对照组患者住院时间为9.24±1.97 d,实验组显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。术前,两组患者疼痛评分无显著差异(P>0.05);实验组术后24 h、术后1周疼痛评分分别为6.51±1.72分、4.55±1.09分,对照组术后24 h、术后1周疼痛评分分别为7.61±1.89分、6.11±1.24分,实验组评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组患者术后并发症发生率为4.00%,对照组患者术后并发症发生率为22.00%,实验组患者术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在接受心脏介入治疗的患者中采取全程心理护理干预能够有效改善患者的心理状况,提高患者生活质量及护理满意度,减少住院时�Objective To explore the effect of whole-course psychological nursing intervention on self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)score,self-rating depression scale(SDS)score,quality of life score,nursing satisfaction score,hospital stay,pain score and complication rate in patients with cardiac interventional therapy.Methods From January 2021 to December 2021,100 patients who received cardiac interventional therapy in our hospital were selected as the main research objects.They were randomly divided into two groups.50 cases in the experimental group received whole-course psychological nursing intervention and 50 cases in the control group received routine nursing intervention.The SAS score,SDS score,quality of life score,nursing satisfaction score,hospital stay and pain score were compared between the two groups by t test;the incidence of complications between the two groups was compared by x^(2) test.Results Before nursing,there was no significant difference in SAS score and SDS score between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing,the SAS score of the experimental group was 39.58±5.14 points,the SDS score was 40.58±6.73,and the SAS score of the control group was 43.21±6.35 points,SDS score was 44.58±6.97,the score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Before nursing,there was no significant difference in the quality of life scores such as mental health,social function,emotional function,somatic pain,physiological function,overall health,and total score between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing,the quality of life scores of the patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05).The nursing satisfaction score of the patients in the experimental group was 95.34±4.11 points,and the nursing satisfaction score of the patients in the control group was 90.52±6.73 points,and the scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the patients in the experimental g

关 键 词：全程心理护理干预 心脏介入治疗 临床效果 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]