检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴颖 项玲 胡光娟 WU Ying;XIANG Ling;HU Guangjuan(Tongshan District People's Hospital,Xuzhou 221006,China)
出 处:《心理月刊》2022年第4期184-186,共3页
摘 要:目的分析急诊外伤患者的心理特点及护理有效措施。方法选择2018年5月~2021年5月在本院急诊科接受治疗的60例外伤患者,以随机数表法分成了两组,每组均有30例外伤患者,对照组采用常规护理模式、观察组采用心理护理模式。对比两组患者护理效果,以x^(2)检验;负面情绪、生活质量、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分,以t检验。结果急诊外伤患者的心理特点主要表现为存在焦虑或抑郁、焦躁、恐惧、紧张等心理现象;观察组仅有1例患者在护理后不良心理情绪未改善,护理有效率达到96.67%;对照组有6例患者在护理后不良心理情绪未改善,护理有效率达到80.00%(P<0.05)。护理前,两组的负面情绪评分和生活质量评分分析不具备差异性(P>0.05),护理后,两组的负面情绪评分均显著降低,与护理前的数据差距较大,并且观察组负面情绪评分比对照组更低,统计差异显著(P<0.05);护理后,两组的生活质量评分显著提升,并且观察组比对照组升高幅度更大,统计差异显著(P<0.05)。护理前,两组的SAS和SDS评分分析不具备差异性(P>0.05),护理后,两组焦虑抑郁评分下降显著,与护理前的数据差距较大(P<0.05),并且观察组评分降低的程度比对照组更大,差距更加显著(P<0.05)。结论在急诊外伤患者的治疗中需要根据其焦虑或抑郁、焦躁、恐惧、紧张等心理,实施针对性的心理护理干预以提高护理效果。Objective To analyze the psychological characteristics and effective nursing measures of emergency trauma patients.Methods 60 trauma patients treated in the emergency department of our hospital from May 2018 to may 2021 were selected.The grouping method is random number table method,which is divided into two groups.There were 30 trauma patients in each group.Routine nursing mode was used in the control group and psychological nursing mode was used in the observation group.The nursing effect of the two groups of patients was compared with x^(2)test;negative mood,quality of life,self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale(SDS)scores,with t test.Results The main psychological characteristics of emergency trauma patients were anxiety or depression,anxiety,fear,tension and other psychological phenomena.In the observation group,only 1 patient had no improvement in bad psychological mood after nursing,and the nursing effective rate was 96.67%.In the control group,6 patients had no improvement in bad psychological mood after nursing,and the nursing effective rate reached 80.00%(P<0.05).Before nursing,there was no difference in the scores of negative emotion and quality of life between the two groups(P>0.05).After nursing,the scores of negative emotion in the two groups decreased significantly,which was significantly different from the data before nursing,and the negative emotion score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the statistical difference was significant(P<0.05);after nursing,the quality of life scores of the two groups were significantly improved,and the increase in the observation group was greater than that in the control group(P<0.05).Before nursing,there was no difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After nursing,the anxiety and depression scores of the two groups at discharge decreased significantly,which was significantly different from the data before nursing(P<0.05);the degree of score reduction in the observation group was gre
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175