ⅠB~ⅢA期可切除非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗后序贯阿替利珠单抗对比最佳支持治疗:IMpower010研究解读  被引量:1

Efficacy and Safety of Sequential Atezolizumab versus Best Supportive Care in Patients with StageⅠB~ⅢA Resectable Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer after Adjuvant Chemotherapy:Interpretation of Data from the IMpower010 Study

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李慧慧 梁斐 曾剑 LI Hui-hui;LIANG Fei;ZENG Jian(The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital),Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hangzhou 310022,China;Department of Biostatistics,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China)

机构地区:[1]中国科学院大学附属肿瘤医院(浙江省肿瘤医院),中国科学院基础医学与肿瘤研究所浙江杭州310022 [2]复旦大学附属中山医院生物统计室,上海200032

出  处:《肿瘤学杂志》2022年第12期1052-1062,共11页Journal of Chinese Oncology

摘  要:IMpower010是一项随机、多中心、开放标签的Ⅲ期研究,该研究比较阿替利珠单抗和最佳支持治疗(best supportive care,BSC)对辅助化疗后完全切除的ⅠB~ⅢA期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的疗效和安全性。主要研究终点是无病生存率(disease-free survival,DFS),次要疗效终点为意向治疗(intention to treat analysis,ITT)人群的总生存率(overall survival,OS)和安全性结局,根据程序性死亡配体-1(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)肿瘤细胞表达(tumor cell,TC)<1%、1%~49%和≥50%进行分层。结果显示,PD-L1 TC≥1%Ⅱ~ⅢA期患者中,阿替利珠单抗治疗对比BSC,2年DFS率为74.8%vs 61.0%,3年DFS率为60.0%vs 48.2%,中位随访32.8个月的DFS显著延长,分别为尚未达到vs 35.3个月(DFS:HR=0.66,95%CI:0.50~0.88)。所有随机化Ⅱ~ⅢA期人群亚组分析中阿替利珠单抗组DFS优于BSC组,尤其是在PD-L1 TC≥50%患者中观察到最大程度的DFS获益(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.27~0.68),2年DFS为87.1%vs 61.2%,3年DFS为73.8%vs 48.6%。在安全性方面,两组的3级或4级不良事件发生率相似,阿替利珠单抗组和BSC组分别为22%(108/495)和12%(57/495)。基于该项研究,阿替利珠单抗在多个国家被批准用于完全切除的、基于铂类化疗的PD-L1 TC≥1%Ⅱ~ⅢA期NSCLC患者的辅助免疫治疗。IMpower010 is a randomized,multicenter,open-label phaseⅢstudy comparing the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab and best supportive care(BSC)in completely resected stageⅠB~ⅢA non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)after adjuvant chemotherapy.The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival(DFS),and the secondary efficacy endpoints were overall survival(OS)and safety outcomes in the intention to treat analysis(ITT)population,based on programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1)tumor cell expression(TC)<1%,1%~49%and≥50%.The data showed that in patients with PD-L1TC≥1%stageⅡ~ⅢA,adjuvant atezolizumab treatment versus BSC resulted in a 2-year DFS of74.8%vs 61.0%and a 3-year DFS of 60.0%vs 48.2%,with a significantly longer median follow-up DFS of 32.8 months,not yet achieved vs 35.3 months,respectively(DFS:HR=0.66,95%CI:0.50~0.88).DFS was better in the atezolizumab group than in the BSC group in all randomizedⅡ~ⅢA population subgroup analyses,with the greatest DFS benefit observed particularly in patients with PD-L1TC≥50%(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.27~0.68),with 2-year DFS of 87.1%vs 61.2%and 3-year DFS of73.8%vs 48.6%.In terms of safety,the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in both groups,with 22%(108/495)and 12%(57/495)in the atezolizumab and BSC groups.Based on this study,atezolizumab is approved in several countries for the adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with fully resected PD-L1 TC≥1%stageⅡ~ⅢA NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy.

关 键 词:非小细胞肺癌 阿替利珠单抗 辅助免疫治疗 无病生存率 

分 类 号:R734.2[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象