检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘泽晖 陈蔚燕[1] LIU Ze-hui;CHEN Wei-yan(College of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences,Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao 266109,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛农业大学化学与药学院,山东青岛266109
出 处:《现代化工》2022年第S02期329-331,337,共4页Modern Chemical Industry
摘 要:通过对阴离子-非离子表面活性剂、非离子-非离子表面活性剂复配体系的起泡性和稳泡性研究发现,聚醚类非离子表面活性剂参与的复配体系泡沫性均较差。在体积比为1∶1时,APG与AEO、APG与OP-10复配体系在6和8 h的稳泡性高于单剂的稳泡性;在SDS与AEO的复配体系中,当体积比为1∶1时,从2~8 h该复配体系的稳泡性一直高于单剂的稳泡性。由此可见,SDS和APG复配体系均具有较好的泡沫性能,但非离子表面活性剂的起泡性和稳泡性均较低。The foaming performance and foam stability of anionic/non-ionic surfactants and non-ionic/non-ionic surfactants complex systems are studied.It is found that the complex systems involving in polyether nonionic surfactants always have poor foaming properties.Under a volume ratio of 1∶1,both APG/AEO and APG/OP-10 complex systems exhibit better form stability at 6 h and 8 h time point than single agent.Under a volume ratio of 1∶1,SDS/AEO system has always shown a higher foam stability from 2 h to 8 h than single agent.It can be concluded that both SDS-containing and APG-containing complex systems have good foaming performance,and non-ionic surfactants show low foam property and foam stability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28