比较法视域下非诉调解协议效力规则的优化——以《新加坡调解公约》为切入  

Optimization of the Effectiveness Rules of Non-litigation Mediation Agreement from the Perspective of Comparative Law——Take the Singapore Mediation Convention as an Entry Point

作　　者：李佳[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《商事仲裁与调解》2022年第3期90-100,共11页Commercial Arbitration & Mediation

摘　　要：非诉调解协议的效力确认程序是二重审查模式,无法满足实践中调解制度的运用,影响调解的执行和效力发挥。面对国内调解环境的改变和国际商事调解的发展,非诉调解协议效力规则亟需完善。《新加坡调解公约》对国际商事和解协议的审查程序与我国非诉调解协议效力确认程序具有相似性,但我国非诉调解协议并不具备强制执行力,与《新加坡调解公约》存在差异,这为非诉调解协议效力规则的优化提供了借鉴基础。本文通过比较各国和地区非诉调解协议效力规则的立法,在赋予非诉调解协议强制执行力,以及确认非诉调解协议的遮断效力等几个方面提出对非诉调解协议效力的立法予以完善的建议,以更贴合调解实践的发展。The validity confirmation procedure of the non-litigation mediation agreement is a double review mode,which cannot meet the application of the mediation system in practice,and affects the execution and effectiveness of the mediation.Facing the changes in the domestic mediation environment and the development of international commercial mediation,the rules on the validity of non-litigation mediation agreements need to be improved urgently.The review procedures for international commercial settlement agreements under the Singapore Convention on Mediation are similar to the procedures for confirming the validity of non-litigation mediation agreements.However,non-litigation mediation agreements in my country are not enforceable and are different from the Singapore Convention on Mediation.The optimization of the validity rules of the mediation agreement provides a reference basis.By comparing the legislation of the non-litigation mediation agreement validity rules in various countries and regions,this paper proposes to improve the legislation on the validity of non-litigation mediation agreements in terms of giving the non-litigation mediation agreement enforceability and confirming the blocking effect of the non-litigation mediation agreement,which can be in line with the development of mediation practice.

关 键 词：非诉调解协议 强制执行力 《新加坡调解公约》 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]