中国企业应诉域名争端研究:基于WIPO域名争端案例的分析  

Chinese Enterprises’ Response to Domain Name Dispute Analysis:Based on WIPO Domain Name Dispute Cases

作　　者：张磊 郑翔文 ZHANG Lei;ZHENG Xiangwen

机构地区：[1]世界知识产权组织 [2]世贸组织亚太培训中心 [3]上海对外经贸大学贸易谈判学院、世贸组织中国讲席研究院 [4]北京市康达律师事务所

出　　处：《商事仲裁与调解》2020年第2期18-31,共14页Commercial Arbitration & Mediation

基　　金：上海高校智库项目的资助。

摘　　要：近年来,涉及互联网络域名的争议案件数量增长迅猛。世界知识产权组织(World Intellectual Property Organization,简称WIPO)的仲裁与调解中心接受国际互联网名址分配公司ICANN授权,成为由其指定的第一个"域名纠纷处理服务提供者",以其制定的《统一域名争议解决政策》(Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy,简称UDRP)为主要裁定依据。中国企业因此类域名争端近几年被投诉的案件数量在世界各国排名中居高不下,但中国企业在应对此类域名争端案件方面尚不成熟,在其合法持有域名的情况下被商标权人投诉的案件较多且大多数以"败诉"告终。文章将从WIPO仲裁与调解中心解决域名争端的主要裁定依据UDRP及相关规则入手,结合对2018年典型的WIPO域名争端案例的分析,为中国企业应对域名争端提出建议。The number of domain name dispute cases is increasing remarkably these years.The Arbitration and Mediation Center of World Intellectual Property Organization accepted the authorization of ICANN(The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), becoming the first" provider of domain name settlement dispute services" with the main arbitral basis of Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(UDRP). Chinese enterprises now lack of experiences and strategies in response to the Internet domain name disputes, most of the cases ended in failure whether as the complainant or the respondent. This paper will provide suggestions for Chinese enterprises in response to the domain name disputes, starting with UDRP rules and the analysis of WIPO domain name dispute panel decisions in 2018.

关 键 词：域名争端 WIPO UDRP规则 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]