史学视角下传统文化的现代元素  

Modern Elements in Traditional Culture:A Perspective from Historiography

作　　者：刘永祥 陈其泰[2] Liu Yongxiang;Chen Qitai

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学马克思主义学院,266100 [2]北京师范大学历史学院,100875

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2021年第2期64-72,158,共10页Historiography Bimonthly

摘　　要：中国传统史学中孕育的现代元素被新史学家重新发现和发扬,成为吸收外来进步文化的内在基础,现代史学发展的主流绝非是抛开传统的对外移植。公羊历史哲学的兴盛为进化史观的传播提供了思想基础;内涵丰富的民本思想是史学致用功能现代化的重要媒介;历久弥新的考信传统滋养了新历史考证学;原有的史书体裁也以灵活的形式传承创新。凡此皆可证明,所谓中国史学失去自我、新旧史学之间的"断层""移植",等等,既不符合历史事实,也违背史学发展的基本规律。现代史学的建构自始至终都贯穿着或隐或显的民族文化本位意识,无论是主张历史解释者,还是推崇历史考证者,都与传统史学一脉相承。Modern Chinese historiography is neither a rejection of traditional Chinese historiography nor a simple copy of Western ideas.New historians have discovered modern elements in traditional historiography which served as the internal basis for absorbing progressive elements from foreign cultures.The historical philosophy of the Gongyang School provided the ideological foundation for the spread of evolutionism.The people-oriented thought became an important medium for the modernization of historiography in practice.The enduring tradition of textual criticism nourished new philological research.The old genres of historical writing had also been inherited and updated.All of these continuities have testified against some assertions.For example,some claim that Chinese historiography has lost its identity in modern transformation.Some argue that there is a broken link between traditional and modern historiographies.Others believe that modern historiography is a foreign transplantation.As a matter of fact,the national culture-oriented consciousness has run through the construction of modern Chinese historiography since its very beginning.Some advocate for historical interpretation and others for historical textual research,but both are part of the same genealogy from traditional historiography.

关 键 词：公羊历史哲学 民本思想 历史考证 历史编纂 现代史学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]