检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱云品 Zhu Yunpin
机构地区:[1]南京大学社会学院
出 处:《中国研究》2022年第1期156-180,340-341,共27页China Studies
摘 要:在已有关于政策执行偏移的研究中,作为政策目标群体的民众尚未得到充分的关注,其对政策执行成效的影响亦在一定程度上被忽略。本文以“禁补令”政策在县域社会的执行情况为例,从民众意愿这一自下而上的视角解释该政策执行失效的原因,并在此基础上探究民众意愿对于政策执行的作用机制。研究发现,包括多数学生家长和教师群体在内的民众主体,对于“禁补令”政策的实质反对意愿是构成家教活动得以在基层社会隐秘而持续存在的基础。而民众意愿则是通过“制造隐秘”“舆论施压”“关系庇护”三条路径分别从实践、话语以及制度与文化层面对政策的执行过程产生影响。In the previous research on the deviation of policy implementation,the figure of the people as the policy target group has been vague,and its impact on the effectiveness of policy implementation has been relatively neglected.Based on the implementation in the county society of the“Remedial Class Ban”,which prohibits in⁃service teachers from participating in the organization of paid tutors,this paper attempts to explain the reasons for the failure of the policy from the bottom⁃up perspective of people's will,and on this basis,to explore the mechanism of people's will for the practice of policy implementation.The study finds that the substantial opposition of the public subjects,including most students,parents and teachers,to the ban,is the source of the secret but stable operation of tutoring activities in the grass⁃roots society.This public will has an impact on the implementation of the policy from the aspects of practice,discourse,system and culture through the three paths of“secrecy making”,“public opinion pressure”and“relationship asylum”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.230.40