国际刑事缺席审判的规则演进与现实启示  

Trials in Absentia in International Criminal Justice and its Inspirations for China

作　　者：郭晶 GUO Jing

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院法学研究所,上海200020

出　　处：《国外社会科学前沿》2020年第8期22-32,95,共12页JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCES

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“国际追逃中的刑事缺席审判制度研究”(19CFX033)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国的刑事缺席审判程序自增设以来,还未有相关的司法判决。国际刑事司法中丰富的缺席审判实践,可以为我国适用缺席审判程序提供参考。从纽伦堡军事法庭到联合国前南斯拉夫问题法庭、卢旺达问题法庭、国际刑事法院,再到近期的黎巴嫩混合法庭,国际刑事审判机构对缺席审判的态度经历了从宽容到限缩再到适度放宽的曲折过程。流变中的取舍之争,对我们理解缺席审判正当性、平衡惩罚犯罪与保障人权的关系具有重要的启示意义。我国可以辩证地借鉴国际刑事缺席审判经验,从案件选择标准、送达规则和重审权限制等方面进一步完善我国的缺席审判程序。Since trials in absentia has been introduced into Criminal Procedure law,there has been no application of trials in absentia.International Courts and Tribunals have abundant practice of trials in absentia,which can provide a reference for China.From Nuremberg Tribunal to ICTY,ICTR,ICC and the recent STL,international criminal judicial bodies hold different views to trials in absentia,from broad application to limited application.The transformation of whether apply trials in absentia in international criminal justice helps us understand the legitimacy and legality of trials in absentia and how to balance the significance of putting an end to impunity and the protection of human rights.China can learn from their experience and try to reform our trials in absentia procedure from the rules of selecting cases,serving indictments and requesting retrials.

关 键 词：缺席审判 国际刑事司法 公平审判 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]