检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙笑侠[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学数字法治研究院
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2024年第2期61-83,共23页Law and Social Development
摘 要:法学为何应该从算法研究扩展到对数字权力的研究?观察商业与国家两种应用场景下的数字技术之影响,可发现数字私权力和数字公权力已经形成,它们带来的普遍社会性风险正在威胁人权并重塑法治。作为一种新型的权力,数字权力从事实和规范两个层面来看,都是具有法律性质的权力,其应该被纳入法学范畴,进而也应当被纳入法律概念体系。数字权力在接受法治控制的同时,还能够克服人类法治的固有弊端、改善人权和法治并造福人类。正是基于这样的逻辑起点,数字法治有了明确而特殊的使命——利用数字权力塑造一个能够“赋能扬善”的未来法治。Why should legal studies shift from examining algorithmic power to investigating digital power?By observing the impacts of digital technologies in both commercial and governmental contexts,one can discern the emergence of digital private power and digital public power,which are posing widespread societal risks that threaten human rights and redefine the rule of law.As a novel form of power,digital power is characterized by its legal nature at both factual and normative levels,necessitating its inclusion within the realm of legal studies and subsequently within the legal conceptual framework.While subject to the governance of the rule of law,digital power has the capacity to overcome the inherent shortcomings of the human rule of law,enhance human rights and the rule of law,and ultimately contribute to the betterment of humanity.It is based on this logical premise that the digital rule of law assumes a clear and distinctive mission to utilize digital power in shaping a future rule of law that is able to be“empowering and promoting goodness”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185