检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐丽娜 TANG Li-na
机构地区:[1]云南大学法学院
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2023年第4期46-57,共12页Journal of Sichuan Police College
基 金:云南大学研究生创新人才培养项目“研究生课程教材建设质量提升计划”(cz22622202)
摘 要:量刑统一是法制统一在司法领域的基本体现。毒品犯罪案件属于重罪案件,其量刑问题具有较高的社会关注度。近年判例样本显示,毒品犯罪量刑不统一的现象较为严重。造成这一现象的原因主要有四,一是相关的法律条文明确性不足,留下的自由裁量空间过大,二是法官对刑事政策的解读和把握存在差异,三是毒品犯罪案件管辖不明确,四是辩护人辩护策略的误用。因此,解决毒品犯罪量刑差异过度问题,应细化量刑规范,正确解读刑事政策,限缩毒品案件的管辖法院,提高量刑辩护质量,完善类案检索系统。The unification of sentencing is the basic embodiment of the unity of the legal system in the judicial field.Drug crime cases are serious crime cases,and their sentencing issues have high social concern.In recent years,sample jurisprudence shows that the phenomenon of inconsistent sentencing for drug offences is relatively serious.There are four main reasons for this phenomenon,one is the lack of clarity of the relevant legal provisions,leaving too much room for discretion,the second is the difference in judges'interpretation and grasp of criminal policies,the third is the unclear jurisdiction of drug crime cases,and the fourth is the misuse of defense strategies by defenders.Therefore,to solve the problem of excessive differences in sentencing for drug crimes,it is necessary to refine sentencing norms,correctly interpret criminal policies,limit the competent courts for drug cases,improve the quality of sentencing defense,and improve the search system for similar cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28