惠达《肇论疏》的中道佛性论诠释  

The Interpretive Characteristics of Middle-way Buddha Nature Theory in Huida’s Zhao Lun Shu

作　　者：杨本华 Yang Benhua(College of Philosophy,Anhui University)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学哲学学院

出　　处：《普陀学刊》2022年第2期39-53,338-339,共17页

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“儒佛道三教关系视域下中国特色佛教文化的传承与发展研究”(18ZDA233)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：随着晋宋中国佛教思想界从般若性空向涅槃佛性妙有的思潮席卷全国,惠达《肇论疏》在诠释僧肇般若性空著作《肇论》的同时加入了融摄佛性妙有的内容,并围绕佛性本有始有之辨、因果感应之辨以及大小顿悟之辨,创造性地提出“非本非始”“非因非果”“非顿非渐”的中道方式解决了当时空有合流中的思想界争议问题。不仅是对晋宋中国佛教思潮转变的一次思想史总结,也开启了《肇论》注疏从空入有的转变,奠定了后世《肇论》注疏空有互摄的理论基础。With the turning of Chinese Buddhist ideological circles from Prajñā to Mahāparinirvāna,the theory of Buddha nature was added to the annotation of Zhao Lun in Huida’s Zhao Lun Shu.Huida focuses on three issues:the dispute over whether Buddha nature is innate or acquired,the dispute over cause and effect interactions,and the dispute over the difference of insight.He creatively proposed the middle way of“non-origin and nonbeginning”,“non-cause and non-effect”,“non-stopping and non-gradual”,and solved the ideological disputes in the confluence of emptiness and existence at that time.It is not only a summary of the ideological history of the change of Chinese Buddhist thoughts in Jin and Song Dynasties,but also opened the transition from emptiness to existence annotations in Zhao Lun,and laid the theoretical foundation for the integration of Prajñā and Tathāgatagarbha thought in the annotation of Zhao Lun.

关 键 词：惠达 《肇论疏》 魏晋南北朝 空有合流 《涅槃无名论》 

分 类 号：B948[哲学宗教—宗教学]