司法科技:实现正义的新选择及其不足——以三家互联网法院为视角  

LawT ech:a New Choice to Realize Justice and its Shortcomings—From the Perspective of Three Internet Courts

作　　者：陈旭辉 Chen Xuhui

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院人权法律研究中心

出　　处：《网络信息法学研究》2020年第1期152-171,272-273,共22页Journal of Cyber and Information Law

摘　　要：随着时代的发展,司法科技逐渐崭露头角,成为当前司法体制改革的重中之重。作为实现正义的新选择,从程序正义的角度上看,司法科技可以提高司法效率,促进程序公开透明;从实体正义的角度上看,司法科技有助于实现同案同判,促进法律适用的规范与统一。然而,司法科技并非实现正义,根治司法顽疾的"灵丹妙药",一方面其在诞生之初就存在着"基因缺陷",另一方面其在运行中与司法理念发生矛盾。应正视司法科技的"天花板",明确定位,限制范围、强化救济,为司法体制改革服务。With the development of the times,LawTech has gradually emerged and become the top priority of the current judicial system reform.As a new choice to achieve justice,from the perspective of procedural justice,LawTech can improve judicial efficiency and promote the openness and transparency of procedures;from the perspective of substantive justice,LawTech can help to achieve the same case and the same sentence,and promote the norms and unity of legal application.However,LawTech is not a"panacea"to achieve justice and cure the stubborn judicial diseases.On the one hand,it has"genetic defects"at the beginning of its birth,on the other hand,it conflicts with judicial concepts in its operation.We should face up to the"ceiling"of judicial science and technology,define the position,limit the scope,strengthen the relief,and serve for the reform of judicial system.

关 键 词：司法科技 司法改革 人工智能 算法 大数据分析 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]