威尔逊和公共行政研究:与里佩尔的商榷  

Woodrow Wilson and the Study of Public Administration:Response to Van Riper

作　　者： 杨翱飞(译) 张桐(校改) Kent A.Kirwan(University of Nebraska at Omaha)

机构地区：[1]内布拉斯加大学奥马哈分校 [2]南京大学

出　　处：《秘书》2022年第2期25-31,共7页Secretary

摘　　要：里佩尔认为,威尔逊的著名文章《行政之研究》对美国公共行政研究或理论的发展并没有发挥什么作用,针对此,文章解析了威尔逊在公共行政研究领域的创始人地位,重点在于政治-行政二分。与里佩尔相反,科万论证指出,在很大程度上应当保留威尔逊作为主要创始人的荣耀,并解释了威尔逊的历史贡献及其当代影响。The status of Woodrow Wilson as a founder of the academic field of public administration is explored in light of Paul Van Riper’s contention that Wilson’s famous essay,“The Study of Administration”,had no influence on the evolution of the study or theory of public administration in the United States.The major focus is the politics-administration dichotomy.Kirwan,contrary to Van Riper,argues that Wilson’s reputation as a major founder is richly deserved and he attempts to explain the nature of Wilson’s contribution and its significance for the field today.

关 键 词：创始人 伍德罗·威尔逊 政治-行政二分 公共行政 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]