从实用主义到科学实践哲学发展的三阶段:皮尔士-布兰顿-劳斯  

Three Stages of Development from Pragmatism to Philosophy of Scientific Practice:Peirce-Brandom-Rouse

作　　者：张毓芳妃 ZHANG Yu-fangfei(School of Marxism,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China)

机构地区：[1]河海大学马克思主义学院,南京210098

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2023年第5期45-50,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“智能时代的具身性科学实践研究”(22CZX024);2022年度高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“论具身思想对科学实践哲学的延展性启迪”(2022SJYB0036);河海大学中央业务经费自由探索项目“具身性科学实践哲学研究”(2098/B220201002)

摘　　要：古典实用主义对于“实践”的阐释被很多人视作科学哲学实践转向的先声。但实用主义有其自己的发展脉络,尤其是皮尔士对于符号的阐发,对于共同体的关注等,被新实用主义代表布兰顿等人充分地承袭并发扬。实用主义的确是科学实践哲学可资借鉴的宝藏,但两者对“实践”内涵的阐释有区别,对符号、推理与外部世界关系的理解有不同,对自然与规范关系的剖析有差异。科学实践哲学对新实用主义做了进一步的继承与发展。The interpretation of“practice”by classical pragmatism is regarded by many people as the precursor of the practical turn of philosophy of science.However,pragmatism has its own development path,especially Peirce’s interpretation of symbols and his concern for the community,which was fully inherited and developed by New Pragmatists such as Brandom and others.Pragmatism is indeed a treasure that can be used for reference by the phi⁃losophy of scientific practice,but their understanding of the connotation of“practice”is different,their under⁃standing of the relationship between symbols,inference and the outside world is different,and their analyses of the relationship between nature and norms are different.The philosophy of scientific practice has further inherited and developed new pragmatism.

关 键 词：科学实践哲学 实用主义 新实用主义 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]