论构成性原则的视角主义阐释与超越问题  

On the Perspectivist Explanation and Its Transcending Approach to the Constitutive Principles

作　　者：贾向桐[1] JIA Xiang-tong(Faculty of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2023年第3期11-17,共7页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：国家社科基金“当代科学哲学中的不充分决定问题研究”(21FZXB061)

摘　　要：21世纪以来,当代科学哲学的先验论进路发展到了一个关键的瓶颈期,如何阐释构成性原则的合理性构成能否实现新突破的关节点。从逻辑上看,弗里德曼主张在对逻辑实证主义的重估中发展一种强调动态、功能化先验原则的科学哲学之路,这延续了库恩后期思想的基本脉络,并与自然主义形成对照。但这一路径在解决相对主义问题仍存在一定的困难,为此,马里亚诺等提出将视角主义作为解释构成性原则的新模式,这构成先验论新拓展的一种有益尝试。但这一工作的欠缺之处在于没有阐明二者融合的依据或基础,为此文章提出进一步把二者置于科学实践这个共同的平台上展现新进展的可能视域,即把构成性原则的视角主义阐释纳入实践哲学的视野之中,通过实践活动的自然化和规范化维度来消解新先验论和视角主义依然存在的张力问题。The development of dynamics a priori in modern philosophy of science has reached a critical stage since the New Century,and how to solve the problem of the rationality of constitutive principles becomes a key breakthrough.From the view of logic,Friedman proposed to re-evaluate Logical Positivism and rethink naturalism in order to extend a dynamic and functionalized reason,which continues the route of Kuhn’s later thought and contrasts with naturalism.But the new way still cannot solve the problem of relativism.Under the circumstances,Mariano proposed that scientific perspectivism should be a new model to explain the principle of constitutionality,and it has become a new direction of the choice.But the deficiency of this work lies in the lack of clarification of the foundation for two sides,so we put these two approaches,constitutive elements and perspectivism unified in practical philosophy,which would provide a better understanding of the problem between the naturalizing and normative dimensions.

关 键 词：动态先验论 视角主义 构成性原则 自然主义 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]