检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹正汉 郑翔益 Cao Zhenghan;Zheng Xiangyi(School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University;Department of Sociology,Zhejiang University)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学公共管理学院 [2]浙江大学社会学系
出 处:《开放时代》2023年第4期144-163,9,共21页Open Times
摘 要:当代中国拥有强大的国家能力,但是,在公共事务上,不同领域的治理能力有明显的强弱差别。本文发现,治理能力强的领域,通常具备两项条件,一是采用地方分权,一是鼓励社会参与;反之,治理能力弱的领域,通常限制社会参与,或者,既实行中央集权,又限制社会参与。其原因是,公共事务治理需要协调中央政府、地方政府与社会三者之间的关系,特别是需要协调三者之间的目标冲突,其主要的协调机制即“纵向约束机制”,只有在地方分权和社会参与的条件下,才能有效地发挥作用。Contemporary China has a strong state capacity,but in public affairs,there are obvious differences in governance capacity in different areas.This paper finds that areas with strong governance usually meet two conditions:local decentralization and social participation.By contrast,areas with weak governance often have limited social participation,or both strong centralization and weak social participation.The difference is due to that public affairs governance needs to coordinate the relationship between the central government,local governments and society,especially where their goals conflict,and the main coordination mechanism,so-called“vertical constraint mechanism”,can only play an effective role under the conditions of local decentralization and social participation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222