检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁波 王国军 李振 DING Bo;WANG Guojun;LI Zhen(Military Vehicle Engineering Department,Army Military Transportation University,Tianjin 300161,China)
机构地区:[1]陆军军事交通学院军用车辆工程系,天津300161
出 处:《军事交通学院学报》2020年第7期29-33,共5页Journal of Military Transportation University
摘 要:为客观评价轮式战术车辆的软地面通过性,为车辆能否通过特定地面提供判断依据,对车辆圆锥指数、平均最大压力和挂钩牵引力系数3个评价指标进行比较分析。认为3个指标皆可用于评价车辆的软地面通过性。相较而言,车辆或车队在选择机动路线时,车辆圆锥指数法在快速判断该路线能否通过方面有明显的优势。In order to objectively evaluate the soft ground trafficability of wheeled tactical vehicles,and to provide a basis for judging whether vehicles can pass through a specific ground,this paper compares and analyzes three evaluation indexes of vehicle cone index,average maximum pressure and drawbar traction coefficient.It is considered that the average maximum pressure method and the coupling traction coefficient method can be used to evaluate the soft ground trafficability of vehicles,and they depend on the cone index method to varying degrees in use.In the field operation of wheeled tactical vehicles,the cone index method of vehicles has obvious advantages in the evaluation of soft ground trafficability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70