胡适疑古思想再探讨——兼论20世纪30年代的胡、顾关系  

Re-Discussion on Hu Shih’s T hought of Doubting Antiquity, and to Discuss the Relationship betw een Hu Shih and Gu Jiegang in the 1930s

作　　者：王学进 Wang Xuejin

机构地区：[1]浙江中医药大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《近代史学刊》2020年第1期182-196,290,共16页Journal of Modern Chinese History

摘　　要：疑古辨伪是胡适学术思想的重要特征。顾颉刚在《我是怎样编写古史辨的》中称,胡适曾于1929年对他说其不疑古而要信古。受顾颉刚的历史叙述影响,大多数研究者认为胡适在1929年之后疑古思想发生转变,将此视为胡适与顾颉刚及古史辨派分道扬镳的肇端。二者疏离固为事实,然别有隐情,学术观点的差异并不表明胡适疑古思想发生了变化。从胡适在30年代前后的学术研究情况尤其是禅宗史研究来看,其疑古思想一以贯之,甚至较之前有过之而无不及。Doubt about history detection of forgeries is an important feature of Hu Shih’s academic thoughts.In the"how I wrote the discernment of ancient history",Gu Jiegang mentioned Hu Shih saying that he didn’t doubt the ancient but believed in it.Under Gu Jiegang’s influence,most researchers believed that Hu Shih’s thought of doubting antiquity changed later in1929,and took this as the sign of separation between Hu Shih and Gu Jiegang in the ancient history of discourse.It is a fact that they are separated,there’s a dark underside to such alienation.The different academic point of view does not represent that Hu-Shih’s thought of doubting antiquity changed.From his research research on history of Buddhism in the 1930 s,we found that the suspicion is even deeper comparing with before rather than transforming.

关 键 词：胡适 疑古思想 顾颉刚 禅宗史 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]