佛耶本土化的小同与大异——以牟子《理惑论》与德尔图良《护教篇》的论辩策略和时代背景为例  

Small Similarities and Big Differences of Localization of Buddhism and Christianity:Taking the discussional strategies and time backgrounds of Tertullian’s Apology and Mou Zi’s Li Huo Lun for example

作　　者：王林 WANG Lin

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《基督宗教研究》2022年第2期134-151,共18页Study of Christianity

摘　　要：基督教兴起与佛教传入中国之后,二者都面临着与既有社会进行调适的问题。在罗马,面对一些责难,基督教有识之士开始写文章澄清误解、表明信仰。与此同时,在中国,佛教也出现了类似的论辩文献。它们的论辩思路也有诸多相似之处,如先与原有思想相区分,随后利用既有思想并积极融入既有社会。但东西方论战的大背景有较大的差异,即基督教具有较强的政治独立性。而最根本的差异是既有统治思想状况,即中国已经实现了儒教化,且儒教的政治独立性相对较弱。正是这种根本的差异最终导致了基督教和佛教在中国发展路径的最终差异,进而影响之后的历史发展。After the rise of Christianity and the introduction of Buddhism into China,Christianity and Buddhism are faced with the adjustment of the existing society.In Rome,faced with some censure,Apologists began to write articles to clarify misunderstandings and expressed their beliefs.At the same time,there are similar argumentative documents in Buddhism in China.Their argumentation ideas also have many similarities,such as,firstly,distinguishing from the original ideas,then using the existing ideas and actively integrating the existing society.However,there are great differences in the background of the debate between Roman and the China,that is,Christianity has strong political independence.The most fundamental difference is the atmosphere of existing ruling ideology,that is,China has realized Confucianism,and the political independence of Confucianism is relatively weak.It is this fundamental difference that finally leads to the final difference in the development path of Christianity and Buddhism in China,and then affects the subsequent historical development.

关 键 词：《护教篇》 早期基督教与希腊哲学 《理惑论》 儒释道的融合 

分 类 号：B948[哲学宗教—宗教学] B978