语文学家金口约翰:《诗篇释义》与《加拉太书注释》中的文法学方法  

John Chrysostom as Philologist and its Grammatical Method in Expositiones in psalmos(CPG 4413)and In epistulam ad Galatas commentaries(CPG 4430)

作　　者：彭昱森 PENG Yusen

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院

出　　处：《基督宗教研究》2022年第1期120-142,共23页Study of Christianity

摘　　要：古代文学批评中的“文法学方法”包括“技术”、“探究”与“专门”三部分。金口约翰的解经综合使用了上述方法,尤其重视文法类比、“判断”与转义;称其为语文学家当之无愧。以“字义解经”或“历史”归纳金口约翰的“文法学方法”是不全面的或有歧义的,最恰当者应是“文法类比”。金口约翰的“文法学方法”的解经实践反映了希腊、拉丁两大解经传统在核心主题与结论上的共识,以及方法选择、论证方式、具体议题等方面存在的分歧;希腊传统内部的家族相似性能否证明“安提阿学派”的存在,仍须更多证据。The Grammatical Method in ancient literary criticism consists of three components:ἱστορικόν,τεχνικόν,andἰδιαίτερον.John Chrysostom,who deserves to be called a philologist,used these methods in his exegesis in a comprehensive manner,with particular emphasis on grammatical analogy,judgment,and tropes.It would be incomplete to summarize John Chrysostom’s Grammatical Method in terms of literal interpretation and be ambiguous history.The most appropriate term would be Grammatical Analogy.The exegetical practice of John Chrysostom’s Grammatical Method reflects a consensus between the two exegetical traditions,Greek and Latin,on themes and conclusions,as well as differences in methodological choices,argumentation,and specific issues.More evidence is needed as to whether family similarities within the Greek tradition prove the existence of the Antiochene School.

关 键 词：文法学 文法类比 探究 判断 转义 

分 类 号：B978[哲学宗教—宗教学]