检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵新新 Zhao Xinxin
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院警务学院
出 处:《刑法论丛》2022年第3期436-463,共28页Criminal Law Review
基 金:2022年上海政法学院青年科研基金支持
摘 要:行刑法治化是罪刑法定原则在刑事执行领域的延伸和体现,是依宪治国、依法治国和加强人权法治保障的应有之义。日本的行刑法治化在路径上经历了特别权力关系论、特别权力关系修正论、特别权力关系否定论、诸利益衡量论,至今处于正当程序关系论之下的发展探索中。中日行刑法治化面临的共同问题是在立法以及刑事执行中如何处理惩罚与处遇的界限、服刑人员权利与义务的边界。我国具有贯彻落实法治主义和正当程序关系论的根基。据此,确立服刑人员的义务法定、人权推定、权利救济司法化以及行刑中的自由刑纯化、行刑社会化,正是日本行刑法治化路径中的经验、教训于我国的启示意义。Legalization of execution is the extension and manifestation of the principle of statutory crime and punishment in the field of criminal execution,and it is the proper meaning of governing the country according to the constitution,governing the country according to the law and strengthening the protection of human rights and the rule of law.The legalization of execution in Japan has experienced the development and exploration of the special power relationship theory,the special power relationship revision theory,the special power relationship negation theory,and the interest measurement theory.It is still under the development and exploration of the due process relationship theory.The common problems faced by China and Japan in the Legalization of execution are:how to deal with the boundary between punishment and judicial state,and the boundary between the rights and obligations of prisoners in legislation and criminal execution.China has the foundation to implement the doctrine of the rule of law and the theory of due process relationship.Accordingly,the establishment of legal obligations of prisoners,presumption of human rights,judicialization of rights relief,and the purification of free punishment,the socialization of execution in execution are the enlightenment of Japan’s experience and lessons in the path of legalization of execution in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38