非法经营罪兜底条款解释理念的重构——“回应—限缩”二元刑法解释理念之提倡  

Reconstruction of the Explanation Idea of the Crime of Illegal Business Operation——Advocate of the Concept of“Response-constriction”Dual Interpretation of Criminal Law

作　　者：郭玮 Guo Wei

机构地区：[1]北方工业大学文法学院法律系

出　　处：《刑法论丛》2022年第3期257-284,共28页Criminal Law Review

摘　　要：非法经营罪的兜底条款经常被视为该罪滥用的根源,然而兜底条款承接了投机倒把罪规范经济运行的功能,是当前政府调控市场经济的利器,具有历史与现实的必要性。非法经营罪保护的法益不应局限于特定经营活动的行政许可制度,应为市场交易管理秩序,兜底条款为法益保护预留了足够的空间。由于依赖“本质”概念,类型解释理论有生成类推解释结论的风险,导致非法经营罪沦为“口袋罪”。“回应—限缩”二元刑法解释理念可将非法经营罪兜底条款的适用限制在妥当范围之内。在法教义学层面,秉持“去中心化”及“路径导向”的刑法解释理念,在社科法学层面,秉持功能主义及合宪性的刑法解释理念,通过不同层面内刑法解释理念回应与限缩效能的博弈,妥当划定非法经营罪兜底条款的犯罪圈。The bottom-saving clause of the crime of illegal business operation is often regarded as the root of its abuse,However,the bottom-saving clause has the function of regulating the economic operation of the crime of speculation and profiteering.It is a sharp tool for the current government to regulate the market economy and has the historical and realistic necessity.The legal interest protected by the crime of illegal business operation should not be limited to the administrative licensing system of specific business activities,but should be the order of market transaction management.Relying on the concept of“essence”,type interpretation theory has the risk of generating analogical interpretation conclusions,which leads to the crime of illegal business operation being reduced to“mouth crime”.The concept of“response-limit”dual interpretation of criminal law can limit the application of the provisions of illegal business crime to the proper scope.At the level of legal doctrine,it holds the concepts of“decentralization”and“path orientation”,at the level of social science law,it holds the concepts of functionalism and constitutionality of criminal law interpretation.Through the different levels of the criminal law interpretation concept response and the game of limiting the effectiveness of the appropriate delineation of illegal business crime to the bottom of the provisions of the criminal circle.

关 键 词：非法经营罪 兜底条款 类型解释 去中心化 功能主义 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]