论法条竞合与想象竞合的区分  

The Distinction between Concurrence of Rules and Imaginative Concurrence

作　　者：曾一珩 ZENG Yiheng

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心

出　　处：《刑法论丛》2022年第1期158-190,共33页Criminal Law Review

摘　　要：现有的法条竞合与想象竞合的学说难以满足司法实践中定罪量刑的需要,应当以竞合制度的逻辑结构和价值取向作为区分法条竞合和想象竞合的切入点。竞合制度建立在禁止重复评价与全面评价两个原则之上,在法条的包容关系中,按照特殊法优于一般法的原则可以同时实现禁止重复评价原则和全面评价原则,但在交叉关系中只有从一重罪从重处罚才能实现两个原则的协调。法条之间的关系是概念外延的关系,对外延的界定要从犯罪的构成要件出发,考虑入罪标准对外延的作用,正确区分法条的包容关系与交叉关系。The existing theory of concurrence of rules and imaginative concurrence can not meet the needs of conviction and sentencing in judicial practice.The logical structure and value orientation of concurrence system should be taken as the starting point to distinguish concurrence of rules and imaginative concurrence.Concurrence system is based on two principles.One is Prohibition Repeatable Evaluations,and the other one is comprehensive evaluation.When some provisions are in inclusive relationship,the principle of prohibition of repeated evaluation and comprehensive evaluation can be realized at the same time according to the principle that special law is superior to general law.However,when they are in crossing relationship,the coordination of the two principles can be realized only when one felony is given heavier punishment.The relationship between articles is the relationship of concept extension.The definition of extension base on the elements of crime,and should take incriminating standards on extension into consideration,only in this way can inclusive relationship and cross relationship of articles being correctly distinguished.

关 键 词：法条竞合 想象竞合 法律逻辑学 构成要件关系说 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]