截贿行为之刑法教义学初探——基于第三人受托行贿、受贿的类型化分析  

Study on the Application of Criminal Law to the Interception of Bribery by a Third Party

作　　者：莫晓宇[1] Mo Xiaoyu

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《刑法论丛》2020年第3期183-203,共21页Criminal Law Review

基　　金：2016年国家社科基金年度重点项目“风险社会视阈下刑事立法科学性研究”(批准号:16AFX009)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：第三人利用受托代为行贿、受贿之机截留贿赂的行为中,贿赂财物不因被不法行为所利用的"被动状态"而丧失受法律保护的资格;防止贿赂被其他不法行为再度侵害和肆意践踏之必要,乃被截留贿赂之法益,故截贿行为亦应由刑法规制。就行为类型而论,受托行贿中的截贿,因第三人交付贿赂的举动系协助请托人收买国家公权力,非介绍贿赂罪所能涵盖,且契合诈骗罪成立要件,应以行贿罪共犯+诈骗罪并罚;受托受贿中的截贿,因主观上未超出共谋受贿的射程,客观上服从并服务于协同受贿的"大局",且请托人并未因第三人截贿而陷入错误认知、导致额外损失,故该行为应囊括于受贿行为中,以共犯论。In the occasion of that,a third party intercepts bribery,it is necessary for criminal law to protect the bribery.Avoiding others illegally appropriate bribery is the legal interests.When a third party behalf someone who offers bribery,his behavior of intercepting of the bribery should be sentenced as fraud.And the crime of introducing bribery is not suitable for such behavior.And when a third party behalf someone who accepts bribery,his behavior of intercepting of the bribery should not be sentenced as fraud,instead of being sentenced as a complicity of the bribe,for the counter party has not be cheated.

关 键 词：截留贿赂 行贿罪 诈骗罪 受贿罪 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]