已登记但未通知的应收账款转让效力分析与法律续造  

Effectiveness Analysis and Judicial Law-making of the Account Receivable Assignment Registered but not Notified

作　　者：杨丽美 Yang Limei

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学,北京102401

出　　处：《法学杂志》2022年第4期160-172,共13页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：区分原则是我国《民法典》确立的一项重要原则。在应收帐款转让中,合同订立行为与应收帐款转让行为之间在成立要件和法律效果上存在着清晰的区分。作为处分行为之一种的应收帐款转让,无论是出于保障交易安全还是提高交易效率的需要,应当进行公示。通知的主要效力是“知悉”,因此通知不能作为应收帐款转让对第三人生效的要件。应追溯“应收账款”及其转让行为的性质本源,借鉴《民法典》区分原则下的应收账款质押登记生效主义,尊重法典编纂体系,以法律续造的形式解决已登记但未通知的应收账款转让效力问题。The principle of distinction is an important principle established in Civil Code of China.There is a clear distinction between the act of contract conclusion and the act of account receivable assignment in terms of establishment elements and legal effects.As the disposing act,the act of account receivable assignment shall be publicized,whether for the purpose of ensuring transaction security or improving transaction efficiency.The main effect of notice is“knowledge”,so notice cannot be used as a requirement for the effectiveness of the assignment of accounts receivable to third parties.It should trace the nature of“accounts receivable”and its transfer behavior,draw lessons from the principle of validity of pledge registration of accounts receivable under the distinction principle of Civil Code,respect the codification system,and solve the problem of validity of transfer of accounts receivable registered but not notified in the form of legal renewal.

关 键 词：保理 应收账款转让 登记 通知 法律续造 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]