检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林雨佳 LIN Yu-jia
机构地区:[1]上海大学法学院
出 处:《北方法学》2022年第6期107-117,共11页Northern Legal Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“网络时代的社会治理与刑法体系的理论创新”(20&ZD199)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:刑法解释结果的不同可能影响从旧兼从轻原则最终的适用结果。溯其根源,从旧兼从轻原则不是对刑法规定的简单比较而是涉及到行为评价。刑法司法解释等有权解释的介入也完全可能改变从旧兼从轻原则的适用结果。刑法解释对从旧兼从轻原则适用的影响可能会造成司法不统一的不良局面,并且破坏从旧兼从轻原则适用的基本逻辑。刑法解释对从旧兼从轻原则适用的影响虽不可绝对避免,但是部分不当影响应当得到纾解。具体而言,应当避免通过刑法司法解释等有权解释进行司法入罪,同时在立法竞合化越来越多的情况下,可强化立法必要性的论证,提高立法技术,从而减少刑法解释对从旧兼从轻原则适用的不当影响。The different interpretation results of the Criminal Law may affect the final application results of the leniency principle.Tracing back to its origin,the leniency principle is not a simple comparison of the provisions of the Criminal Law but involves the evaluation of behavior.The intervention of judicial interpretation of the Criminal Law may change the application result of the principle.The influence of the interpretation of the law on the application of the principle may cause judicial disunity and destroy the basic logic of the application of the principle.Although the influence of the interpretation of the Criminal Law on the application of the leniency principle is inevitable,part of the improper influence should be relieved.Specifically,we should avoid the judicial incrimination through the judicial interpretation of the Criminal Law and other authoritative interpretation.At the same time,under the circumstance of increasingly legislation cooptation,we should strengthen the demonstration of the necessity of legislation and improve the legislation technology,so as to reduce the improper influence of the interpretation of the Criminal Law on the application of the principle of observing old laws with lighter punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222