检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹文妹[1] 杨波 张冰雨 杨梦霞 侯建红 宋文学 郭晨健 曹宇[1] 张鹏杰 陈刚[1] Cao Wenmei;Yang Bo;Zhang Bingyu;Yang Mengxia;Hou Jianhong;Song Wenxue;GuoChenjian;Cao Yu;Zhang Pengjie;Chen Gang(NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technoligy Assessment(Fudan University),Shanghai 200032;Health Supurvision Bureau of Yunnan Provincial Health Department,Yunnan Kunming 530000)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学国家卫生健康委员会卫生技术评估重点实验室,上海200032 [2]云南省卫生厅卫生监督局,云南昆明530000
出 处:《中国卫生监督杂志》2019年第5期442-449,共8页Chinese Journal of Health Inspection
摘 要:目的 了解2017年云南省卫生监督机构查处案件的违法事实使用情况,为预防卫生违法、有效实施卫生监督提供参考.方法 利用云南省卫生监督信息报告系统的数据,对云南省卫生监督机构案件查处的违法事实使用情况进行统计、汇总和分析.结果 2017年云南省共报告卫生监督查处案件5 064件;各专业共有141项可用有效违法事实,实际使用违法事实75项,使用比为53.19%;有6个专业拥有10项以上可用有效违法事实;各专业案件查处的违法事实使用比介于23.53%-100.00%之间.结论 (1)各专业间案件查处的违法事实使用比差距较大;(2)专业内,多个专业案件查处集中于少数几项违法事实,广义“无证”等占比较高;(3)提示应加大案件查处广度和深度,发挥卫生监督的专业技术性.Objective To undemtand the illegal facts in reality(IFR)of punishment cases at health supervision agency of Yunnan Province in 2017.Method By using the data of Yunnan Province health supervision information report system,the IFR of punishment cases was counted,summarized and analyzed.Result The number of punishment cases at health Supervision agency were totally 5,064 in 2017;the illegal facts in law(IFL)of professional field were 141,IFR were 75 and IFR/IFL Was 53.19%;6 professional fields had more than 10 valid illegal facts;IFPJIFL in each professional field was between 23.53%and 100.00%.Conclusion(1)IFR/IFL in each professional field Was different;(2)many professional cases focused on a few illegal facts,the percentage of broad sense of“no license”Was higher;(3)increasing the breadth and depth of punishment cases,and developing the professional skills of health supervision.
分 类 号:DF36[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.110.165