检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄启荣 HUANG Qirong(Shanghai Jinmao(Lingang New Area)Law Firm,Shanghai 200002,China)
机构地区:[1]上海金茂(临港新片区)律师事务所,上海200002
出 处:《中国公共安全》2023年第6期160-162,共3页China Public Security
摘 要:电动车在充电过程中容易埋下严重的火灾安全隐患,特别是在密集型老旧社区中,因为建筑密集、楼道狭窄、居民间空间有限,所以一旦发生火灾,将迅速蔓延到相邻的建筑,形成连片火灾,给救援工作带来极大困难.因此,对于社区电动车的火灾隐患防范需给予特别重视.基于此,选择南京雨花台区的"2.23"火灾事件为分析案例,通过剖析该事件的基本情况,先展示我国现行社区消防安全相关法律的内容及执行状况,然后提出该类法律在责任追究上面临的挑战,最后结合挑战给出相应建议,希望为法律的完善及社区消防安全的保障提供学术参考和观点借鉴.Electric vehicles are easy to bury serious fire safety hazards during the charging process,especially in intensive old communities,because of dense buildings,narrow corridors,and limited space between residents,so once a fire occurs,it will quickly spread to adjacent buildings,forming a series of fires,which brings great difficulties to rescue work.Therefore,special attention should be paid to the fire hazard prevention of electric vehicles in communities.Based on this,the"2.23"fire incident in Yuhuatai District of Nanjing is selected as an analysis case.By analyzing the basic situation of the incident,the content and implementation of the existing laws related to community fire safety in China are presented first,and then the challenges faced by such laws in accountability are put forward.Finally,corresponding suggestions are given based on the challenges.Hope to provide academic reference and viewpoint for the improvement of law and the protection of community fire safety.
分 类 号:X928.7[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.181.58