2022年医学期刊发表中国指南和共识的科学性、透明性和适用性的评级  

Evaluation and ranking for scientific,transparent and applicable of Chinese guidelines and consensus published in the medical journals in 2022

作　　者：中华医学会杂志社指南与标准研究中心 中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元(2021RU017) 世界卫生组织指南实施与知识转化合作中心 STAR工作组 陈耀龙[2] 魏均民[3] Guidelines and Standards Research Center Chinese Medical Association Publishing House;Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines(2021RU017),Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences;WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation;the Scientific,Transparent and Applicable Rankings(STAR)Working Group;Chen Yaolong;Wei Junmin(不详;Research Center for Guidelines and Standards,Institute of Health Data Science,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Key Laboratory of Knowledge Mining and Services for Medical Journals,Chinese Medical Association Publishing House,Beijing 100052,China)

机构地区：[1]不详 [2]兰州大学健康数据科学研究院指南与标准研究中心,兰州730000 [3]中华医学会杂志社医学期刊知识挖掘与服务重点实验室,北京100052

出　　处：《中华医学杂志》2023年第37期2912-2920,共9页National Medical Journal of China

摘　　要：为持续推动中国指南和共识的评价工作,指南科学性(Scientific)、透明性(Transparent)和适用性(Applicable)的评级(Rankings)(简称“STAR”)工作组在前期工作的基础上研发了指南综合评价体系,成立了37个专科委员会,组织了508名评级委员,对2022年医学期刊发表的334篇中国指南和1143篇中国共识进行了评价。评价结果显示指南平均得分43.4分,相比2021年提升36.1%,共识平均得分28.3分,相比2021年提升24.7%。同时,部分条目(“计划书能够在公开平台获取”“说明了资助在指南制订中的作用”和“提供不同用户版本的指南”)的达标率总体偏低,仍需重点提升。STAR工作组将在相关杂志和平台发布专科评价结果,进一步更新和完善综合评价体系。In order to continuously promote the evaluation of Chinese guidelines and consensus,the Working Group on the Scientific,Transparent and Applicable Rankings(STAR)for guidelines has developed a comprehensive guideline evaluation system based on the previous work.The STAR working group established 37 specialty committees,organized 508 members,and evaluated 334 Chinese guidelines and 1143 Chinese consensus published in medical journals in 2022.The evaluation results showed that the average score of guidelines was 43.4,with a 36.1%improvement compared to 2021.The average score of consensus was 28.3,with a 24.7%improvement compared to 2021.The compliance rate of some items("Identify how the guideline protocol is accessible from an open-source platform""Describe the role of funder(s)in the guideline development"and"Provide tailored editions of the guidelines for different groups of target users")were generally low and need to be further improved.The STAR Working Group will publish the evaluation and ranking results in relevant journals or platforms,and further update and improve the comprehensive evaluation system.

关 键 词：指南 共识 临床实践 综合评价 

分 类 号：R194[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]