检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:FANG Rui CHENG Shuluo
出 处:《外文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)医药卫生》2021年第12期1160-1164,共8页
摘 要:Objective: to compare the therapeutic effects of the acupuncture therapy with the acupuncture therapy in the treatment of shoulder and neck myofascial pain syndrome, aiming at improving the clinical pain and providing a new strategy for the treatment. Methods: 60 patients with cervical and shoulder MPS admitted from May 2018 to May 2019 were randomly divided into catgut embedding group and conventional acupuncture group, with 30 patients in each group, and the patients were treated with point-of-excitation therapy in combination with the pain site. They were divided into catgut embedding group and acupuncture group. After two courses of treatment, the pain improvement of the patients was compared. Results: after treatment, the PRI of catgut embedding group was (1.98±0.98), the acupuncture group was (2.64±1.23), the PPI of catgut embedding group was (0.75±1.15), the acupuncture group was (0.93±1.43), the VAS of catgut embedding group was (2.11±1.67), and the acupuncture group was (3.89±1.21). It can be seen from the above indicators that the improvement of the two groups of patients was better in catgut embedding group, with significant difference. It has statistical significance. Conclusion: embedding method and acupuncture method have good therapeutic effect on neck and shoulder MPS, and there is no significant statistical difference in clinical therapeutic effect between the two methods. However, embedding method has fewer times of treatment and faster operation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
关 键 词:irritant point embedding thread MYOFASCITIS
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13