试析诉讼时效的证明责任  

On Burden of Proving the Limitation of Action

作　　者：佟桂玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]长江大学政法学院,湖北荆州434020

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2007年第6期100-103,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：诉讼时效关系着诉讼的胜败,意义十分重大。在我国,存在诉讼时效证明责任分配不明确的问题,使诉讼时效的立法目的无法实现,有时甚至适得其反。因此,随着我国民事审判制度改革的深入,在证明责任分配上确立诉讼时效审查时的法官不自动援引原则的基础上,由原告承担诉讼时效未完成的证明责任,被告承担诉讼时效完成的证明责任,这样,既符合诉讼时效的立法目的,又有利于我国司法公正。Limitation of action is essential for the victory of the litigation.However,few systemic research or special discussion concerning the topic of burden of proof about the limitation of action has been done.This results in confusion both in theory and practice.There exists problem in our country,such as ambiguity in allo- cation of proof burden.As a result,the legislation purpose of limitation of action has not been realized,and sometimes has been on the contrary.Therefore,by the deep reformation of civil act...

关 键 词：诉讼时效 证明责任 责任分配 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]