检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王普霞[1]
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学研究生部,中国南京210029
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2007年第3期226-229,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的学习方式与学习质量之间存在着直接的因果联系,通过对大学生学习方式差异的研究,为高校因材施教和全面发展教育提供心理学依据。方法本研究采用《大学生学习方式问卷》,对大一到大四4个年级的大学本科生进行了问卷调查,共收回有效问卷307份。结果1大学生的学习方式存在显著的性别和年级差异(P<0.05),其中,学习策略性别和年级差异极显著(P<0.01),学习方法性别差异极显著(P<0.01),年级差异不显著;学习动机性别差异不显著,年级差异极显著(P<0.01);考试方法性别和年级差异不显著。2大学生学习方式总体水平与公共课成绩和总成绩之间的关系显著(P<0.05),而且与专业课成绩之间的关系达到了极显著水平(P<0.01)。结论大学生的学习方式存在显著的性别和年级差异,且对学习成绩产生了显著的影响。Objective There was cause and effect causality between learning style and study quality. For offering the psychological gist, the research of the difference in learning style for undergraduates was carried out. Methods The research surveyed undergraduates from NO.1 to NO.4 grades by the questionnaire in learning style for undergraduates, and called back 307 availability questionnaires. Results (1)The differences of learning styles in gender and grade is distinct for the undergraduates (P<0.05), and the differences of learning strategy in gender and grade is tarnal distinct (P<0.01), the differences of learning method in gender is tarnal distinct (P<0.01), the differences of study motivation in grade is tarnal distinct (P<0.01), the differences of examination method in gender and grade isn't distinct; (2)The relations is distinct between learning style and the achievement in commonality courses or all courses (P<0.05), and the relations is tarnal distinct between learning style and specialty courses (P<0.01). Conclusion The differences of learning styles in gender and grade are distinct for the undergraduates, and its influence for study achievement is distinct.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28