官年与限年——兼与陈长文兄商榷  

Official Age and Limited Age——On the Discussion with Chenzhangwen

作　　者：邱进春[1] 毛晓阳[2] 

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学文学院,江西南昌330022 [2]闽江学院历史系,福建福州350108

出　　处：《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第2期38-41,共4页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<中国历代登科总录>(项目号03BZS008;主持人龚延明教授)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：《明代科举中的官年现象》一文在引用文献时出现理解上的偏差,导致对科道官选拔限年的判断有失准确,万历五年科道选拔的上限是45岁,而不是38岁。该文所谓庶吉士选拔"限年之例始于嘉靖末年"的推断也不够准确,相关文献表明,至少在天顺初期就有限年的规定。明代官年现象除了减年之外,还存在增年现象,这与明代选拔科道官时对年龄既有上限也有下限的规定相吻合。庶吉士选拔年轻化倾向与官员致仕无俸禄的现实,是导致明代士人减年入试的直接原因。There is misunderstanding when the article The phenomenon of Official Age in the Civil Service Examination of the Ming Dynasty quotes documents,as a result,its deduction that the age of the new Ke & Dao officers should be limited under 38 is wrong,and 45 is the right standard.Moreover,its deduction that the Shu Ji Shi should be selected with an age-limitation began at the end of Jiajing is not right either.Some data show it had been introduced since the early time of Tianshun.The phenomenon of official ages...

关 键 词：官年 庶吉士 科道 明代科举 

分 类 号：D691.3[政治法律—政治学]