检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雪平[1]
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第6期832-836,共5页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(04JZD0015)
摘 要:在国际贸易领域,存在着贸易自由化与国家对外贸易管制两种力量,中国和平发展遭遇的贸易保护主义,就是这两种力量发生冲突的具体表现。贸易自由化作为改善和变革全球经济的重要手段,强调贸易利益机会均等,但其非均衡的发展态势,使得国家实行更为严格的对外贸易管制措施甚至贸易保护主义,这进一步加剧了国际贸易中国家间固有的利益冲突,并严重影响到贸易自由化的健康进程。贸易自由化向政治领域和社会领域的渗透和扩张,要求对贸易自由化的利益评价更为客观、公正和透明,要求国家获得利益的途径更为民主化、合理化和合法化。There exist two powers in the field of international trade-trade liberalization and the country's domination on foreign trade.In essence,the trade protectionism being encountered by China on its way of peaceful development is the concrete illustration of the conflict of these two powers. Trade liberalization,as a significant approach to ameliorate and transform the global economy,emphasizes the equal opportunity of trading interests,but its non-balanced posture forces the countries to resort more rigorous foreign trade policies or even to exercise the trade protectionism.Thus,the interest conflicts between the countries in trade are becoming more sharpening and thereby seriously influences the flow of trade liberalization.The permeability and expansion of trade liberalization to the international political and social matters calls for an objective,justifiable and transparent system for the interest-evaluation of trade liberalization and meanwhile demands countries to adopt more democratized,more rationalized and more legalized approaches in obtaining profits from trade liberalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43