检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031 [2]广州市白云区检察院,广州510000
出 处:《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2004年第4期115-118,共4页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:刘涌案引起公众大量非议的重要原因是二审判决书论证不足和公开性不够。加强判决书的说理和论证并向公众公开是树立司法权威、建立为人民服务司法和实现理论界与实务界良性互动所必要的。判决书的论证应从证据能力、证明力、证据的综合认定及法律适用几方面进行。公开判决书可通过网上公布及公共场合展示来实现。Liu Yong case has incurred much criticism from the public. One important reason is that the deliberation and publication in the verdict of second instance is inadequate. Strengthening the persuasiveness and deliberation of the verdict and making it accessible for the public is indispensable for establishing the prestige of justice, constructing a judicial system which serves the people and realizing good interaction between academic and practical cycles. The deliberation of verdict should contain several aspects, such as credibility, weight of evidence, comprehensive identification of evidence and application of law. The publication of verdict can be realized through Internet and exhibiting the verdict in public places.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15