舆论监督和我国的司法独立——对“刘涌案”、“宝马撞人案”的思索  

Supervision by Public Opinion and Judicial Independence in Our Country——thoughts on “LIU Yong case" and “case of the person knocked down by a BMW"

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:伍芬艳[1] 周细波[1] 

机构地区:[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出  处:《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》2004年第5期84-86,共3页Journal of Huan Public Security College

摘  要:司法不能离开舆论的监督,舆论监督也不能对司法独立形成干预,司法的裁判与评价只能以法律作为唯一的标准。国家应当赋予司法机关独立抵御舆论负效应的地位和权限,同时提高法官素质,实行法官精英化,建设一支高水平的法官队伍。Administration of justice can not diverge from supervision of public opinion; on the other hand, supervision by public opinion can not interfere to administration of justice. The referee and appraisal of the administration of justice can only regard law as the only standard. And the country should resist the strength of the negative effects of the public opinion for the judicial independence, improve judge's quality , implement judge elites, and build a high-level judge's team at the same time.

关 键 词:舆论监督 司法独立 舆论负效应 法官精英化 

分 类 号:D920.0[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象