检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈玲[1]
出 处:《绵阳师范学院学报》2003年第3期33-35,共3页Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
摘 要:与国外民法对代位权制度的规定相比 ,我国代位权制度有自己的特点 ,有些规定有所不同 ,从而使债务人的地位和权利受到影响。作为债权的保全制度 ,代位权制度在保护债权人利益的同时 ,不应损害债务人应有的权利。通过对代位权的行使及其效力以及在代位权诉讼中债务人的地位的考察 ,可以看出 ,我国代位权的规定不仅限制 ,而且在一定程度上剥夺了债务人的权利 ,将债务人定位于纯粹义务人。这不仅违背了代位权制度的设立宗旨 。Our subrogation system has its own characteristics compared with a foreign one. Debtors' position and rights will be affected by differences of the regulations. As a protective system for creditors' rights, the subrogation system will bring no harm to debtor's rights .As we explore the application, effects of the subro gation system and debtors' position in a subrogation inspection, we find out tha t the regulations of our subrogation system are not only limited but also depriv e debtors of their rights to a certain degree, regarding debtors as mere obligat ory people. This will violate the initial purpose of our subrogation system in a ddition to being not helpful in preserving the subject's rights in a civil case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.215