两大法系关于信赖利益保护历史演进之比较  

Comparing the Differences of Reliance Interest Protection Between Originin Civil Law and Common law

作　　者：张占奇[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北经贸大学,河北石家庄050061

出　　处：《安阳师范学院学报》2008年第3期32-35,共4页Journal of Anyang Normal University

摘　　要：保护合同信赖利益历来为法律所重视,在大陆法系国家,它是通过对缔约过失者适用缔约过失责任来实现的,而在英美法系则是建立在"允诺禁反言"规则之上的,两大法系就此问题的着眼点及在信赖利益本身所属制度的设计上存在很大差异。因此,有必要从比较法的角度对这两种制度的历史演进加以分析。the protection of contractual reliance interest has always been an important issue in the legal field.In civil law,it is realized through culpa in contrahendo liability.While in common law,it is based on the rule of 'promissory estoppel'.There is a huge difference between the major two legal systems with respect to the viewpoint of this issue and the institutional design itself on the reliance interest.It is necessary to analyze the differences of the two systems from the point of comparative law about thei...

关 键 词：信赖利益 缔约过失责任 允诺禁反言 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]