专家审稿实名制与匿名制之对比分析  

Compare the peer reviewing with and without the authors' names

作　　者：欧阳晓黎[1] 赵蔚婷[1] 牛燕平[1] 赵存如[1] 

机构地区：[1]军械工程学院学报编辑部,石家庄050003

出　　处：《编辑学报》2001年第z1期37-38,共2页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：分析了实名制专家审稿与匿名制专家审稿的优劣性。提出了选择恰当审稿方式的原则。论述了如何选择合适的审稿方式，并对几种典型情况下应采取的审稿方式进行了剖析。指出了编辑在选择审稿方式后应注意的一些问题。The paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of experts' peer review1ng with or without the authors' names, suggests the principles and how to choose suitable ways to evaluate, manuscripts, analyzes a few ways under some typical conditions. And it puts forward some notes for editors to pay attention to after chasing a way of evaluatking manuscripts.

关 键 词：专家审稿 匿名制 对比分析 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]