检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代法学》2001年第4期3-8,共6页Modern Law Science
摘 要:新闻自由、社会公益、当事人权利之间的关系是关涉我国法治筹划和司法改革的一个重要因素。本文取“现场直播进法庭”作为切入点 ,分析了其背后的职权主义诉讼传统底蕴、积极主义司法行为惯性及专务司法之观念意识缺失的原因 ;剖析了“现场直播”进法庭对司法独立性、公正性、脱俗性已构成的侵害和可能的威胁 ;并进而探讨了其与当事人权利之间的冲突。最后 ,概括了“现场直播进法庭”的实质。The relationship between freedom of the press and public interests as well as the rights of the parties concerned constitutes an integral component relating to the constitutional project and judicial reform in China. This article, based itself on the issue of 'live broadcast at the court of justice', explores into the causes that conceive inner secret of the litigious tradition of ex officio doctrine, the positive judicial action and the absence of peculiar judicial idea; analyzes the undue influences that the 'live broadcast at the court of justice' has been brought or will bring on independence of judicature, judicial impartiality as well as the unconventionality in justice; and then, argues about the conflicts that may happen between the program 'live broadcast at the court of justice' and the rights of the parties concerned. Last but not least, the article also reveals the essence of the program 'live broadcast at the court of justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249