夸尔斯案与“公共安全”例外  

New York v. Quarles & "Public-Safety" Exception

作　　者：门小文[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第5期111-114,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则中的"公共安全"例外,是美国联邦最高法院在1984年纽约州诉夸尔斯一案的判决中认可的。根据该判例,警察对犯罪嫌疑人的提问如果是基于对公共安全的关心而合理作出的,那么即使警察在拘押讯问前没有向其发出"米兰达警告",由此所获得的犯罪嫌疑人的归罪陈述也可以被采纳为证据,并且,该例外的适用不依赖于个别警察的主观动机。The "Public-Safety" exception to the exclusionary rule was first recognized by the U.S.Supreme Court in case New York v.Quarles(1984).According to this decision,there might be an exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before a suspect s answers may be admitted into evidence if the police had been acting to protect the public,and that the availability of that exception does not depend upon the motivation of the individual officers involved.

关 键 词：“公共安全”例外 “米兰达警告” 证据排除规则 

分 类 号：D93[政治法律—法学] D94D95D96D97