佛山市中小学心理咨询人员自我效能感的相关影响因素  

Primary and secondary school counseling staff self-efficacy relevant factors in Foshan City

作　　者：郭丽[1] 刘贵浩[1] 薛允莲[2] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学公共卫生学院妇幼卫生学系,广州510080 [2]中山大学公共卫生学院医学统计与流行病学系

出　　处：《卫生研究》2009年第3期323-325,共3页Journal of Hygiene Research

摘　　要：目的了解佛山市中小学校心理咨询人员的一般自我效能感。方法采用多阶段整群抽样的方法随机抽取佛山市中小学心理咨询人员108名,采用自编问卷、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)和简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)进行调查。结果中小学心理咨询专兼职人员的自我效能感存在统计学差异(P=0.003),专职人员自我效能高于兼职人员;中小学专兼职心理咨询人员的消极应对方式存在统计学差异(P=0.007),兼职人员的消极应对高于专职人员;不同学历心理咨询人员的积极应对方式存在统计学差异(P=0.039),硕士及以上人员的积极应对得分最高,大专及以下人员得分最低。结论中小学校心理咨询人员的自我效能与积极应对方式及岗位性质(专、兼职)有关。Objective To understand the general self-efficacy of primary and secondary school counseling staff in Foshan City. Methods Using multi-stage random sampling method to choose 108 counseling staff from primary and secondary school in Foshan City. Taking a self-made questionnaire, General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ) for investigation. Results The self-efficacy of the Primary and secondary school counseling full-time and part-time staff have significant difference (P= 0.003), the self-efficacy of full-time staff above than part-time staff; The negative coping style of the Primary and secondary school counseling full-time and part-time staff have significant difference (P= 0.007), the negative coping style of part-time staff above than full-time staff; different academic counseling staff of the positive coping style have significant difference (P= 0.039), the positive response of Master's degree and above is highest scores, college staff and below is lowest score. Conclusion The self-efficacy of Primary and secondary school counseling staff is related to positive coping styles and the nature of work (full-time or part-time).

关 键 词：心理咨询人员 应对方式 自我效能感 中小学生 

分 类 号：C913.5[经济管理]