检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:中山大学附种第二医院小儿科,广东,广州,510120 中山大学附种第二医院小儿科,广东,广州,510120 中山大学附种第二医院小儿科,广东,广州,510120
出 处:《现代医学仪器与应用》2007年第3期54-56,共3页
摘 要:目的:探讨不同仪器对新生儿黄疸胆红素测定的差异.方法:分别应用微量血测胆仪、经皮测胆仪和静脉血自动生化分析仪三种仪器,对30例新生儿进行胆红素测定,并比较其差异.结果:微量血测胆仪与静脉血测黄疸数值无统计学差别;在黄疸程度中等时,经皮测胆仪与静脉血测黄疸数值无明显差异,在黄疸程度较轻或较重时.两者之间出现差异.结论:微量血测胆仪所测胆红素数值较准确,且快捷方便,对新生儿损伤小,适于对黄一疸的监测.具有较深远的临床意义.Objective: To investigate the differences among different bilirubin measure instruments to neonatal jaundice. Methods: Micromethod, transcutaneous bilirubin instruments and vein serological automatic biochemistry analyzer were performed on 30 cases of neonatal jaundice respectively, and the differences were compared. Results: There was no difference of statistical significance between micromethod and serological method; in the cases of middle jaundice, no difference was exist between transcutaneous and vein serological method, but the difference had statistical significance in the cases with slight or serous jaundice. Conclusion: Micromethod is more accurate, convenient and has microlesion to newborns, it has more clinical significance for the measurement to neonatal jaundice.
关 键 词:胆红素测定 微量血测胆红素 经皮测胆红素 自动生化分析仪
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.192